The debate over daylight saving time has reignited in Nevada, where legislators are proposing to adopt standard time year-round. This move is encapsulated in the “Lock the Clock Act,” spearheaded by Assemblymember Selena La Rue Hatch and state Sen. Robin Titus. If passed, the legislation would take effect in 2026, potentially making Nevada the third state, alongside Arizona and Hawaii, to exempt itself from daylight saving time.
The initiative reflects a broader national conversation, with numerous states considering similar actions. The crux of the debate lies in whether to adopt permanent standard time or daylight saving time, with the latter requiring federal approval. Proponents of permanent standard time, like Jay Pea of Save Standard Time, argue it aligns more closely with natural circadian rhythms, reducing health risks and societal disruptions caused by biannual clock changes.
Despite bipartisan support for ending the time change, legislative progress has been hampered by differing opinions on which time standard to adopt and concerns about economic impacts. Past efforts at both state and federal levels have stalled, including the federal Sunshine Protection Act, which sought to make daylight saving time permanent.
Nevada legislators remain hopeful that their persistence will lead to success, aiming to set an example that might spur federal action. They argue for a consistent time standard, emphasizing that the total amount of daylight remains unchanged regardless of how clocks are set. This ongoing legislative effort underscores the complex interplay between local initiatives and federal regulations in addressing daylight saving time.