Assembly Bill 279 in Nevada proposes a generational ban on cigarette sales to individuals born after December 31, 2004, with a notable exception for large casinos holding nonrestricted licenses. This move aims to reduce the use of combustible tobacco products, which are considered to have the most severe health impacts. While cigars, chewing tobacco, and nicotine-based vape products remain available to those 21 and older, the bill introduces penalties for those under the restricted age attempting to purchase cigarettes.
The bill’s sponsor, Assemblymember David Orentlicher, argues that alternative nicotine products present less harm compared to cigarettes, drawing a parallel to other public health measures like the removal of lead from paint. Despite the exemption for large casinos, intended to accommodate tourists, concerns persist that this could drive more people to these establishments, potentially increasing exposure to gambling.
Critics from various sectors argue the bill could unfairly impact small businesses, create “two classes of adults,” and undermine personal choice. While youth smoking rates are at historic lows, opponents question the bill’s selective approach to tobacco control, suggesting a more comprehensive strategy should include all tobacco products. Some tobacco-free advocates oppose the bill for not addressing all forms of tobacco equally, suggesting it might not effectively target the products most used by younger demographics, such as e-cigarettes.